|
Is Universal Pulling Focus? |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
PHOTO: Josh Brolin, left, and Sean Penn, right, in Milk, a 2008 Best Picture Oscar contender and one of the top properties on this year's Focus Features slate. Los Angeles Times: Anne Thompson has a really good story in today's Variety (See IFD Latest News) breaking the news that Universal is nearing a deal to sell its Rogue Pictures label to Ryan Kavanaugh's Relativity Media. The sale, Thompson reports, would give Kavanaugh Rogue's 30-title library as well as its entire development slate, including four films already set for release in 2009. Universal, which gets $150 million for the Rogue assets, will agree to distribute Rogue films through 2013. Rogue was launched in 2004 by Focus Features as a way for Focus, Universal's specialty film division, to diversify its product, giving it the ability to deliver youth-oriented commercial genre pictures as well as art-house dramas for older moviegoers. So, to quote from the title of Art Linson's current Hollywood satire--what just happened? As usual, Variety--despite Anne's good reporting--has managed to avoid stating the obvious: The sale of Rogue probably marks the beginning of the end for Focus Films. If Universal is willing to dump Focus' genre arm, the most consistently commercial underpinning of its specialty division, then surely it is ready to put the squeeze on Focus itself. Just look around: In an era where entertainment conglomerates are under enormous pressure to save money and drastically lower their overhead, virtually every studio in town has either downsized or shut down its specialty division. Now that Universal has brought DreamWorks on board, which will deliver six or more movies a year, there's really no justification for paying the freight needed to sustain Focus as a full-blown studio division. Even though Focus did a great job with Burn After Reading, going against the conventional wisdom by releasing a Coen brothers movie in early September after the filmmakers had won an Oscar--and outperforming expectations with a great comedy marketing campaign--the old specialty model that created Focus is dead. In a transformed economic environment, studios are no longer willing to subsidize a division that relies on insanely costly Oscar campaigns to try to make its numbers. With Rogue gone, Focus' days are numbered. Just as Warners didn't close up all its specialty divisions at once, preferring to spread out the bad news over a period of months, Universal will probably say, for now, that it's committed to Focus' survival. That's because the company is about to launch Milk, its big end-of-the-year Oscar movie, whose campaign would be undermined if Focus looked like a lame duck. Expect Universal to wait until next spring, after Oscar season is over, before quietly announcing layoffs, signaling that Focus, like Paramount Vantage before it, will remain a label, but without its own marketing and distribution apparatus. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Can You Compare New Media to Old? |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
Newteevee: Chuck Klosterman once wrote that the phrase “comparing apples to oranges” to reference the contrast of two different things was dumb because in many ways apples and oranges are actually very similar (small, round fruits). Recently at least two stories have run comparing online video to its traditional media counterparts, but are these accurate comparisons, or do we need to rethink how to correlate new media with the old? |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Lost Boy Reports from Montreal's Festival du Nouveau Cinema |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
The Lost Boy: Canada's longest running film festival, Festival du Nouveau Cinema (FNC) has seen a remarkable rebound since the drama that surrounded it a few years back. In 2004, the festival came under new management when Daniel Langlois, director of FNC since 1999, left the organization to begin the New Montreal FilmFest. New Montreal's intention was to merge with the Montreal Festival of New Cinema and New Media, thus creating a potentially devastating competitor to FNC, which prides itself on its devotion to cinematic innovation. However, a variety of controversies led to New Montreal's demise, and FNC has since seen both a significant increase in attendance and reputation. This was certainly clear in its 37th edition, held last week amidst Montreal's gorgeous Autumn backdrop. Screening nearly 250 films from 60 countries, in every conceivable format, FNC's broad programming spectrum and commitment to the artist sets it apart from both Montreal's slew of specialty fests and many festivals around North America. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Hamptons International Film Festival: Online Viewing |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
Michael Tully: I should have posted this sooner, but I've been too busy enjoying my time in the Hamptons. Great weather, great people, a very strong line-up, what more could you ask for—aside from wanting to be here, of course. Just so you don't think I'm rubbing it in, I would like to point out that Snag Films has partnered with the Hamptons International Film Festival to show two exclusive documentary features online during the run of the festival. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Five Reasons There Is No Adwords for P2P Yet |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
Brand Asset Digital launched its P2P advertising platform P2Pwords today, promising to bring pay-per-click advertising to file-sharing networks like Limewire, Gnutella and Emule. The NY-based company received a largely positive review from John Healey over at The LA Times Bitplayer blog, who thinks that “the opportunity presented by P2Pwords is so large, it may be hard for advertisers to resist.” |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Does Ballast Really Deserve a Backlash? |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|

Blogspout: Funny how, in the indie film world, falls from grace tend to begin before you’ve even hit the top. Yesterday, Lance Hammer’s Ballast was nominated for four Gotham Independent Film Awards. Meanwhile, the critical darling is, for maybe the first time since its Sundance premiere, provoking sour responses. Armond White wrote a scathing review of the film, but he’s Armond White, so that was somewhat expected. Somewhat less expected was a Hollywood Elsewhere post, where Jeff Wells pounces on White’s review like it’s the smoking yellow cake that makes the case that Ballast is overrated. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Movie Crystal Ball Reveals Born-Again Chihuahuas |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
NY Magazine: With the recent economic woes and the surprise success of Beverly Hills Chihuahua, some expect a shift toward non-depressing escapist films with absolutely no basis in reality. And what about the fall's other surprise non-reality-based hit - the evangelical action spectacular Fireproof — the new film in which Kirk Cameron plays a fireman who overcomes an Internet-porn addiction and huge motherfucking fireballs to save his marriage? Is this the future? Right now Hollywood will green-light literally any film in which Jesus is played by a dog. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
This Weekend's Biggest Indie Hit was on YouTube |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |

Movie City Indie: On Monday, I had a conversation with filmmaker Lance Hammer (see IFD interviews) about how movies like his Ballast could make money in the present and emerging market. And while he's an optimist about the future, he was less than sanguine about breaking even with a film like his today. Which is why this news release leaves me with mixed feelings: "Wayne Wang's new film The Princess of Nebraska made its world premiere on YouTube with more than 165,000 views in its first two days, the online launch represents the most successful studio film premiere in YouTube's history." PHOTO: Wayne Wang |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Historian: YouTube is a Bigger Deal than TV |
|
Wednesday, 22 October 2008 |
|
Newteevee: Scott Kirsner, a journalist who just released a book called Inventing the Movies about technology’s affect on Hollywood, told us this week that he thinks YouTube will is a more influential innovation than television. In his review of movie history, from Smell-O-Vision to digital filming, Kirsner found an “epic battle” between technology and the status quo, with each generation’s doom and gloom predictions — from the likes of Thomas Edison, George Eastman, Jack Valenti, and Sumner Redstone — failing to come to fruition. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Tuesday, 21 October 2008 |
|
Joe Morgenstern in The Wall Street Journal: When Ingrid Bergman asks Sam to sing that deathless song in Casablanca, the lyrics reassure her that the fundamental things still apply. But in the movies, as everywhere else, some of them don't. Traditional superstar power is in steep decline, thanks to salaries that have spiraled out of control, to star vehicles that have become -- along with some of their stars -- repetitive or grotesque, and most of all to changing tastes.
Movies have changed profoundly since the days of Bergman and Bogart -- or Paul Newman. They've changed even more since the days when a film starring Julia Roberts, Tom Hanks, Mel Gibson, Cameron Diaz, Bruce Willis or Tom Cruise was automatically a major event. Will Smith remains a huge draw, the exception to the rule, and Johnny Depp was certainly the animating spirit of three phenomenally profitable pirate extravaganzas. Yet Hollywood glamour is in a lowered state, and young audiences don't much care, even though the full extent of their indifference is still being masked by the white noise of celebrity chatter. Kids are just as likely to turn out for a heavily promoted horror flick, the latest comedy from Judd Apatow's laugh factory or another iteration of the National Treasure franchise. (Or adorable doggies: Beverly Hills Chihuahua won last weekend's box office over Leonardo DiCaprio and Russell Crowe in Body Of Lies.) Meanwhile, grown-ups -- people old enough to sit through a two-hour feature without an uncontrollable urge to text, phone or Twitter -- tell me all too often that most new movies leave them so cold they've stopped going out to theaters. Drawing: Ensemble performances and star turns, by Drew Friedman for the Wall Street Journal. Top row (from left to right): Russell Crowe of American Gangster and L.A. Confidential, Tom Cruise in Magnolia, and Cameron Diaz in Being John Malkovich. Middle row (from left to right): Jeff Bridges in The Big Lebowski, Julia Roberts and George Clooney of Ocean's Eleven, and Cate Blanchett in I'm Not There. Front row (from left to right): Meryl Streep in A Prairie Home Companion, Daniel Day-Lewis in There Will Be Blood, and Jack Nicholson in Chinatown. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|